Jorum Journal Interview

As originally published here

As a deeply process-oriented woodworker, do you see woodworking as an inherently philosophical practice?

Yes. As Socrates said, 'the unexamined life is not worth living'. Being self-taught, I’ve needed to pay close attention to other makers in order to learn for myself. Because of this, I have learned to work in a very particular way, and have not been willing to give that up for a more industrial/commercial method.

As a result, I’ve leant heavily into hand tool work. There’s generally a pretty good reason why things 'have always been done this way', so you need an even better reason to it differently. For me, this has manifested in a close examination of how method impacts result (the work of David Pye has been a big influence). Machines are efficient, precise, and repeatable, but they result in mundane, interchangeable, soulless and often thoughtless pieces. Human eyes and hands are exceptionally good at picking up subtle variations, and the right kinds in the right amounts are actually preferable to us. I generally size my parts by eye to what they should be visually. This creates pieces with much lighter, better balanced elements.

What sets woodwork apart is that it is exclusively a reductive process. I can only make a piece of wood smaller. I can glue bits together, but once a piece is cut, that's it. When it took 60 years for this piece of wood to grow, and there are no other identical boards, and I’m taking it from its raw, blank state – whatever I do with it needs to be an improvement. This means taking a long time looking at the features of specific boards – grain patterns, colours, strength and movement characteristics – to ensure their best use. If I don’t pay very close attention to why I’m doing something in a particular way, there’s no reason to be doing it at all.

Different woods have vastly different aromas, changed again by how the wood is treated – how does the fragrance of wood affect your experience as a maker?

The smells and sounds of woodwork are some of the best parts! Taking a shaving of cyprus pine (a citrus, minty smell), or applying the first coat of tung oil (a rich orange oil made from nuts) are a real treat. In many aspects this kind of work is mentally and physically challenging, and as I mentioned above, the actual process of the work forms a huge part of why I do it. Metal working, in my mind, is a necessary evil of woodworking. A dull tool is a useless and dangerous tool. I don’t look forward to a messy, greasy session of smelling steel and cutting fluid, but the smell of fresh sawdust? The sound of a sharp plane iron glide through wood? Yes please! (The exception to this is traditional hide glue, which smells like halitosis and flatulence).

What drew you to the Japanese and Scandinavian aesthetic and philosophical principles your work is inspired by?

Starting out with a passion for woodwork, but without regular access to a workspace, tools, or materials, I spent a lot of time reading – particularly about how different cultures have approached the craft. Japanese tools evolved in a totally different environment to Western ones, so work in very different ways. I’ve not looked back since I swapped my saws to Japanese style, and am slowly building a chisel and plane collection. Japan also has a very strong cultural history for craft, and a deep religious connection to it. I think particularly of temple construction – of all-wood structures built with mind-bending joints designed to be regularly disassembled and repaired – and the tea ceremony with its focus on how objects, and how they’re used, can contain a different kind of beauty.

Nobody does mid-century quite like the Danish, and nobody has quite found the same success in blending mass-manufacturing, hand tool work, accessibility in price, and quality of work since. For someone with a particular fascination with chair design, there's something incredible about the variety of chairs designed during that period, all of them revolutionary and timelessly beautiful. Hans Wegner’s CH24 is a big part of why I got into furniture making.

Both styles contain a very quiet, subtle and serene beauty – work that doesn’t shout for attention, but rewards close inspection. There are no unnecessary embellishments, but every part is exactly how it should be. Furniture should improve its environment, not overpower it.

What does craftsmanship mean to you?

The name I use for my work, Sheahan Made, was a deliberate choice. Anything I make is forever connected to me as a person and as a maker. I make things to last, so I need to make them well. Craftsmanship to me is doing the work well, even if it’s slow. It is also about keeping the owner of a piece constantly in mind, and ensuring that what I’m going to deliver exceeds their expectations. As my brother says, 'you can do it right, or you can do it again'.


Tools and the Impact of Methodology

 

"Utility, material, and technique, if taken into due consideration, automatically give us the calm, warm beauty of the artisan works that we use daily."
— Yanagi Sōetsu

If you have delved into the varied and complex worlds of manufacturing methods, both modern, industrial, and traditional crafts, you will start to see key markers or witness marks key to the chosen method of production. The use of hand-tools influence the resulting objects in countless ways.

Starting from the most foundational, straight lines and right angles are an obvious tell-tale sign of human influence, and ubiquitous in our built environment. The same can be said for measuring systems. If you grew up being taught the metric system, you probably think in centimetres, and design to the nearest 5mm. If you were taught the imperial system, you probably think in fractions of an inch, and wouldn’t dream of rounding to the nearest 13/64”. If you instead measure things proportionally, either by body parts (waist-high, within reach, fits my hand) or by ratio (put a stretcher 1/3 down a table’s undercarriage vs 30cm down) you will end up with noticeably visually different objects. The same is true of tool use.

A machine cuts dovetails equally spaced, but hand-cut dovetails don’t have to be.

A machine cuts dovetails equally spaced, but hand-cut dovetails don’t have to be.

If you are taking a board to desired thickness for a table top with a scrub-plane and then a smoothing-plane. You are unlikely to bring the underside, where it will never be seen, to the same surface finish, as it makes no practical or economical sense to do so. These witness marks, irregularities, and imperfections “hint at the infinite” and we are deeply tuned to reject the cold, harsh, impersonal results when these are artefacts aren’t present.

Similarly, machine cut joinery requires rotating blades at some point in the process. These blades come in fixed sizes (often imperial if manufactured for the American market) and for efficiency you are likely to design casework with joinery and parts of the same dimensions, not because it will serve the proportions of the final object, but result as a side-effect of that particular method.

This is not to say machine-made objects are bad. There are reasons William Morris’ Arts and Crafts movement eventually petered out. Machine-made goods are cheap, consistent, available and good-enough, but they sometimes represent a missed opportunity.

This is why I have a focus on hand-tool methods. It may be slower, more difficult, and result in irregularities, but there is beauty in the time taken, and the ability to design without a ruler, but by eye, depth to the imperfections, and uniqueness in the resulting story.

“A work devoid of innate beauty is a dead work: this is therefore the importance of the artist-craftsman to whom we today ask not only to produce good works, but also to work closely with the 'traditional craftsmanship so as to revive beauty even in everyday objects." — Yanagi Sōetsu

Further Reading:
By Hand and Eye — George R. Walker and Jim Tolpin
The unknown craftsman — Yanagi Sōetsu

 
 
 

About the Logo

 

If you were to list the projects that come under the banner of “Sheahan Made” chronologically, a good argument could be made that the top spot has to belong to the logo.

Japanese Seal

The pictogram you see used now is based on Japanese seals, which are traditionally used in lieu of signatures.
Their security against forgery comes from the irreproducible irregularities unique to each hand-carved ‘hanko’.

Japanese craft culture has been a major influence on my journey as a maker, which you can read more about here. The isolated evolution of Japanese woodworking techniques have created
a unique set of tools and methodologies which intrinsically impact the final object.
I talk more about the impact tools have on an object
here.

Somewhat obfuscated within the mark are my initials, and that was where the process actually begun. Everything I make is impacted in some way by the very fact that it is me making it. Hence why my work is made under the name ‘Sheahan Made’, permanently connecting my name to each item. Therefore, the mark acts as a kind of fingerprint or witness mark.

Logo-Lightbox.gif

After a slight change in proportions, a few extra lines to strengthen the hanko aesthetic, tweaking of proportions and line weights for using the logo at different scales, you end up with a 17x15 grid of white and black squares. The simplicity and geometry of this construction is what makes this mark repeatable, memorable, and transferable

A seal or signature in the world of paper, is the maker’s mark in the world of craft. A ‘signing off’, a stamp of verification or endorsement, a lasting mark signifying quality and provenance.

Tradition, the nature of hand-made items, identity and history, quality and longevity. These are the concepts that form the foundation of Sheahan Made and are represented by this logo.